Investor is deciding whether to buy an investment property that will be negatively geared. They want to know the real out-of-pocket weekly cost after the tax benefit before they commit to the purchase.
Example: $10,000 shortfall at 37% marginal rate = $3,700 tax saving per year. Your actual out-of-pocket is $6,300.
Important: The strategy only profits overall if capital growth exceeds the ongoing cash shortfall. It is not a guaranteed strategy.
1 What this calculator does
Calculates rental shortfall, annual tax saving from negative gearing, and true out-of-pocket net cost after tax benefit. Supports Australian marginal tax rates. Shows whether the property is positively or negatively geared and quantifies the tax-effective holding cost.
2 Formula & professional reasoning
Rental shortfall = Total deductions - Rental income
Total deductions = Mortgage interest + Other costs + Depreciation
Tax saving = Rental shortfall x Marginal tax rate
Net out-of-pocket = Rental shortfall - Tax saving
Positively geared: Rental income > Total deductions (taxable surplus)
Negative gearing occurs when allowable deductions on an investment property exceed the rental income. The shortfall is deducted from the investor's other income (salary), reducing taxable income and generating a tax refund at the investor's marginal rate. The higher the marginal tax rate, the larger the tax benefit. At a 37% marginal rate, the government effectively covers 37 cents of every dollar of shortfall -- reducing the out-of-pocket cost significantly.
3 Worked examples
⚠️ Illustrative example only — not clinical or professional instruction.
Total deductions: $28,000 + $8,000 + $5,000 = $41,000 | Shortfall: $41,000 - $22,000 = $19,000 | Tax saving: $19,000 x 0.37 = $7,030 | Net out-of-pocket: $19,000 - $7,030Shortfall: $51,000 - $26,000 = $25,000 | Tax saving: $25,000 x 0.47 = $11,750 | Net: $13,250/yrYear 1: shortfall $16,000, tax saving $5,920 | Year 5: shortfall $10,000, tax saving $3,700 | If income reaches $38,000: positively geared, surplus $04 Sanity check
5 Common errors
| Error | Cause | Consequence | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treating the tax saving as a guaranteed return | Assuming the marginal tax rate remains constant | Tax reform, income reduction or change in tax residency can dramatically reduce the benefit | The tax saving depends on your marginal rate -- which can change. A $20,000 shortfall that saves $7,400 at 37% saves only $3,800 if income drops to the 19% bracket. |
| Forgetting depreciation requires a quantity surveyor report | Guessing depreciation without a formal report | Depreciation claim underestimated or overclaimed -- ATO compliance risk | For any investment property built after 1985, engage a qualified quantity surveyor to prepare a Tax Depreciation Schedule. The cost ($400-$700) is itself tax deductible and typically recovers its cost in the first year's depreciation benefit. |
| Not including all ownership costs in the deductions | Using only interest and management fees | Tax benefit understated -- investor thinks cost is higher than it actually is | Include all deductible costs: interest, rates, insurance, management fees, maintenance, advertising, accounting fees and depreciation. Check the ATO rental property guide for the full list. |
| Assuming negative gearing automatically makes the property a good investment | Focusing on the tax benefit rather than total return | Holding a poor-performing property because the tax benefit makes the holding cost bearable | The tax benefit reduces the holding cost -- it does not create wealth. Wealth comes from capital growth and rental income. A property with a $10,000 tax benefit but zero capital growth is still a bad investment. |
6 Reference & regulatory links
7 Professional workflow
Common tools used alongside this one: