Skip to calculator
Investment Free · No login

Property Investment ROI

Total return on a property investment combining capital growth and rental yield over your hold period. Free real estate calculator for property investment roi. AU...

💰
🎯

Investor has held a property for 7 years. Before deciding whether to sell or hold, they want to know what the actual annualised return has been -- combining rental income and capital growth.

Property Investment ROI
Investment
Rates + insurance + maintenance + mgmt
Stamp duty + legal + inspection
Total return includes capital growth + net rental income. This is the full picture.
Cash-on-cash return = annual after-cost rent ÷ cash invested (your deposit + costs). This measures the return on your actual cash outlay — useful when comparing leveraged vs unleveraged investments.
ℹ️ Results are estimates for planning purposes. Verify with current standards and a qualified professional.

1 What this calculator does

Calculates total return, total ROI and annualised ROI on an investment property held over a defined period. Combines capital gain and cumulative net rental income. Outputs cash-on-cash return on the equity invested.

2 Formula & professional reasoning

Capital gain = Current value - Purchase price Net annual rental income = (Weekly rent x 52) - Annual costs Total net rental (held period) = Net annual rental x Years held Total return = Capital gain + Total net rental Total ROI (%) = Total return / (Purchase price + Acquisition costs) x 100 Annualised ROI (%) = Total ROI / Years held

Total property return combines capital growth (the change in property value) with net rental income (the cash the property generates after expenses). The combined figure is the total wealth generated by the property. Annualised ROI divides this by the holding period to give a comparable annual return -- important for comparing property performance against shares, superannuation or other assets over the same period.

3 Worked examples

⚠️ Illustrative example only — not clinical or professional instruction.

Basic
7-year hold -- capital growth focused
Given: Purchase price: $520,000 | Current value: $840,000 | Acquisition costs: $25,000 | Weekly rent: $350 | Annual costs: $12,000 | Years held: 7
Working: Capital gain: $840K - $520K = $320,000 | Net annual rent: $350x52 - $12,000 = $6,200 | Total net rent (7yrs): $6,200 x 7 = $43,400 | Total return: $320,000 + $43,400 = $363,400 | Total invested: $520,000 + $25,000 = $545,000 | Total ROI: $363,400/$545,000 x 100 | Annualised: / 7
Answer: Total return: $363,400 | Total ROI: 66.7% | Annualised ROI: 9.5%
💡 9.5% annualised return compares favourably with the ASX All Ordinaries at approximately 9-10%/yr over the same period, but this calculation excludes CGT on sale and does not account for leverage effects.
Standard
High-yield regional property -- income focused
Given: Purchase: $340,000 | Current value: $420,000 | Acquisition costs: $15,000 | Weekly rent: $420 | Annual costs: $9,000 | Years held: 5
Working: Capital gain: $80,000 | Net annual rent: $420x52-$9,000 = $12,840 | Total net rent: $64,200 | Total return: $144,200 | Total invested: $355,000 | Total ROI: 40.6% | Annualised: 8.1%
Answer: Total return: $144,200 | Annualised ROI: 8.1%
💡 Strong income component (almost half the total return from rent) compared to the capital growth focused example above. Different risk profile -- regional properties carry higher vacancy and liquidity risk.
Advanced
Underperforming property -- should I have sold earlier?
Given: Purchase: $750,000 | Current value: $790,000 | Acquisition costs: $35,000 | Weekly rent: $420 | Annual costs: $18,000 | Years held: 8
Working: Capital gain: $40,000 | Net annual rent: $420x52-$18,000 = $3,840 | Total net rent: $30,720 | Total return: $70,720 | Total invested: $785,000 | Total ROI: 9.0% | Annualised: 1.1%
Answer: Annualised ROI: 1.1% -- well below inflation and market alternatives
💡 This property has underperformed significantly. At 1.1% annualised, the investor would have been better served by shares or superannuation. The analysis should trigger a hold vs sell review.

4 Sanity check

Long-run property return benchmarks (AU)
Total return (capital + income): 9-11%/yr long-run major capitals | Capital growth alone: 6-8%/yr | Net rental yield: 2.5-4.5%
Comparison benchmarks
ASX All Ordinaries (including dividends): approx 9-10%/yr | Super balanced funds: 7-9%/yr | 10-yr government bonds: 3-5%/yr
Property should be compared to alternatives on a risk-adjusted basis.
This calculation excludes
Mortgage interest paid (significant cost) | CGT on sale | Depreciation benefits | Land tax | Stamp duty (included in acquisition costs)
For a true after-cost return, deduct all interest paid over the holding period from total return.
Leverage effect
A 10% return on a $750,000 property bought with $150,000 deposit is a 50% return on equity -- positive leverage magnifies returns when property grows
Leverage also magnifies losses if property falls.

5 Common errors

ErrorCauseConsequenceFix
Not including acquisition costs in the denominator Using purchase price only ROI overstated -- stamp duty, conveyancing and inspection costs are part of the true investment Always include stamp duty, legal fees and other acquisition costs in the total invested amount.
Using gross rental income instead of net Not subtracting annual expenses from rental income Rental return component overstated -- total return appears higher than it is Subtract all annual holding costs (rates, insurance, management, maintenance) from gross rental income before calculating net rental contribution to return.
Not accounting for mortgage interest paid Omitting the financing cost Return appears very strong but the interest paid over 7 years may be $200,000+ -- dramatically reducing true net return For a complete return analysis, deduct total interest paid (from your loan statements) from the total return. This gives the true return on all capital employed including debt.
Treating an annualised ROI of 5% as a direct comparison to a managed fund returning 5% Not adjusting for different risk profiles and leverage Misleading comparison -- property return includes leverage (borrowed money) while managed fund return is typically unleveraged To compare property and shares on a like-for-like basis, either compare both on an unleveraged basis or account for the interest cost of the leverage on the property side.