Landlord gets the monthly statement from the property manager and cannot figure out why there is never any money left. Before the next meeting with the accountant, they need the full monthly cash flow broken down.
Negative cash flow: Costs exceed rent — you top up the shortfall from your own income. You may claim the shortfall as a tax deduction (negative gearing).
Most Australian investment properties are negatively geared, relying on capital growth for total return.
1 What this calculator does
Calculates monthly and annual investment property cash flow from weekly rent, vacancy allowance, mortgage repayment, property management fee, fixed costs and maintenance. Shows whether the property is positively or negatively geared and the true monthly out-of-pocket cost.
2 Formula & professional reasoning
Monthly gross rent = Weekly rent x 52 / 12
Effective rent = Monthly gross rent x (1 - Vacancy rate)
Total monthly costs = Mortgage + Management + Fixed costs/12 + Maintenance/12
Monthly cash flow = Effective rent - Total costs
Annual cash flow = Monthly cash flow x 12
Monthly cash flow is the most practical metric for landlords because it represents the actual bank account impact each month. The vacancy rate (typically 2-4% in tight rental markets, 5-10% in slow markets) converts gross rent into effective rent. Fixed annual costs (rates, insurance, land tax) are divided by 12 to create a monthly provision -- even though they are paid annually or quarterly, they need to be reflected in the monthly analysis.
3 Worked examples
⚠️ Illustrative example only — not clinical or professional instruction.
Monthly gross rent: $450x52/12 = $1,950 | Effective: $1,950x0.97 = $1,892 | Costs: $3,200+$180+$300+$333 = $4,013 | Cash flow: $1,892 - $4,013Monthly gross: $480x52/12 = $2,080 | Effective: $2,080x0.96 = $1,997 | Costs: $1,800+$200+$200+$250 = $2,450 | Cash flow: $1,997 - $2,450Portfolio monthly: -$1,200 - $800 + $450 = -$1,550/mo | Annual: -$18,600 | At 37% tax rate, saving: $18,600 x 0.37 = $6,882 | Net out-of-pocket: $11,718/yr ($225/week)4 Sanity check
5 Common errors
| Error | Cause | Consequence | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Using 52 weeks rent without a vacancy allowance | Assuming the property is always tenanted | Income overstated -- actual cash flow worse than modelled | Always apply a vacancy rate. Even in tight markets a property is typically vacant for 1-3 weeks between tenancies plus potential arrears periods. |
| Forgetting property management letting fees | Including the ongoing management percentage but not the letting fee | Annual costs understated -- especially in markets with higher tenant turnover | Add one to two weeks rent per year as a provision for letting fees. In high-turnover markets this can significantly impact annual cash flow. |
| Not separating principal and interest in the mortgage repayment | Treating the full repayment as a cash outflow against rental income | Cash flow looks worse than the tax position reflects -- interest is deductible but principal repayment is not | For tax purposes only the interest component is deductible. For cash flow analysis use the total repayment. For profitability analysis separate interest (deductible expense) from principal (equity building). |
| Not updating the model when interest rates change | Using the initial modelled repayment in an interest rate rising environment | Cash flow significantly worse than the model shows | Recalculate mortgage repayments whenever the interest rate changes. A 1% rate rise on a $500,000 loan adds approximately $417/month to repayments. |
6 Reference & regulatory links
7 Professional workflow
Common tools used alongside this one: