A public transport pass is available for the commute, and before deciding whether it's worth the switch, you want the real annual dollar comparison against driving.
Public transport annual = Weekly PT cost × 52
Difference = Car annual cost − PT annual cost
For the fairest comparison, use the True Cost of Car Ownership Calculator's full output (including depreciation) as the car cost input, not just fuel.
1 What this calculator does
Compares annual car ownership cost against annual public transport cost, showing the dollar and percentage difference. Designed to be used alongside the True Cost of Car Ownership Calculator, so the car side of the comparison includes depreciation and all real ownership costs, not just fuel.
2 Formula & professional reasoning
Public transport annual cost = Weekly PT cost x 52
Difference = Car annual cost - Public transport annual cost
% potential savings = (Difference / Car annual cost) x 100
A fair comparison between driving and public transport requires using the true total annual cost of car ownership (including depreciation, insurance and maintenance, not just fuel) against the full annual cost of a public transport pass or fares. Comparing only fuel cost against a transport pass dramatically understates the car's real cost and biases the comparison toward driving, since fuel is typically a minority of total car ownership cost. This calculator is intentionally paired with the True Cost of Car Ownership Calculator so the car-side figure entered here reflects the complete picture.
3 Worked examples
⚠️ Illustrative example only — not clinical or professional instruction.
PT annual = 30x52 = $1,560 | Difference = 5000-1560 = $3,440 (68.8% potential savings)PT annual = 55x52 = $2,860 | Difference = 9800-2860 = $6,940 (70.8% potential savings)PT annual = 85x52 = $4,420 | Difference = 14500-4420 = $10,080 (69.5% potential savings)4 Sanity check
5 Common errors
| Error | Cause | Consequence | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparing PT cost against fuel cost only | Using only the car's fuel cost (not total ownership cost including depreciation) as the comparison figure | Dramatically understates the car's true cost and produces a misleadingly small (or even negative) apparent saving from switching to PT | Use the full annual car ownership cost from the True Cost of Car Ownership Calculator (including depreciation, insurance, maintenance and fuel) as this calculator's car cost input |
| Ignoring non-financial factors entirely | Making a car-vs-PT decision purely on the dollar comparison without weighing travel time, convenience, and flexibility | A financially favourable switch to PT may not be practical if it significantly increases commute time or reduces flexibility for the household's actual needs | Treat the dollar comparison as one important input alongside genuine consideration of travel time, convenience, and whether a car is still needed for other trips |
| Assuming a full switch when partial switching is more realistic | Comparing 100% car cost against 100% PT cost when the realistic scenario is keeping a car for some trips while using PT for a regular commute | Overstates the potential savings if a full car-free lifestyle isn't actually being considered | If only shifting the commute to PT while keeping a car for other trips, compare PT cost against just the commute-attributable portion of car costs (a share of fuel and wear specific to that trip), not the full annual car ownership cost |
| Not accounting for the time cost of commuting differently | Ignoring that public transport commutes are sometimes longer than driving, which has its own real cost in time even if not a direct dollar figure | A financially favourable comparison may still not be worthwhile if the time cost is significant for the household's circumstances | Factor in realistic commute time for each option alongside the dollar comparison when making the actual decision, even though this calculator only addresses the financial side |
6 Reference & regulatory links
7 Professional workflow
Common tools used alongside this one: