Client wants to understand why they gained weight eating what seemed like 'normal' amounts. Before you can explain calorie balance, you need their actual BMR so the conversation is grounded in their specific numbers.
Mifflin (M): (10×W) + (6.25×H) − (5×A) + 5
Mifflin (F): (10×W) + (6.25×H) − (5×A) − 161
Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) is the most accurate for general population — validated in multiple studies. Harris-Benedict (1984 revision) remains widely used but overestimates by ~5% on average.
1 What this calculator does
Calculates Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) -- the calories burned at complete rest to maintain vital functions. Uses Mifflin-St Jeor (most validated) and Harris-Benedict revised (1984) for comparison. BMR is the foundation for all calorie and nutrition planning.
2 Formula & professional reasoning
Mifflin-St Jeor (1990):
Male: BMR = (10 x kg) + (6.25 x cm) - (5 x age) + 5
Female: BMR = (10 x kg) + (6.25 x cm) - (5 x age) - 161
Harris-Benedict revised (Roza and Shizgal 1984):
Male: BMR = 88.362 + (13.397 x kg) + (4.799 x cm) - (5.677 x age)
Female: BMR = 447.593 + (9.247 x kg) + (3.098 x cm) - (4.330 x age)
BMR represents approximately 60-70% of total daily energy expenditure for sedentary adults. Mifflin-St Jeor is preferred over the original Harris-Benedict (1919) because it was validated on a larger, more diverse modern population and is more accurate for both normal-weight and obese individuals. Both are estimates with approximately +-10% individual variation.
3 Worked examples
⚠️ Illustrative example only — not clinical or professional instruction.
Mifflin: (10x85)+(6.25x178)-(5x35)+5 = 850+1112.5-175+5Mifflin: (10x62)+(6.25x165)-(5x29)-161 = 620+1031.25-145-161Mifflin: (10x75)+(6.25x170)-(5x65)+5 = 750+1062.5-325+54 Sanity check
5 Common errors
| Error | Cause | Consequence | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eating below BMR as a weight loss strategy | Thinking a larger deficit is always better | Metabolic adaptation, muscle loss, hormonal disruption, rebound weight gain | Weight loss calorie targets should be above BMR. A moderate 300-500 kcal deficit below TDEE is the evidence-based approach -- not below BMR. |
| Using the original 1919 Harris-Benedict formula | Older textbooks still reference the original equation | BMR overestimated by 5-15% -- inflated calorie targets | Use Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) as the primary reference. The revised Harris-Benedict (1984) is acceptable but slightly less accurate. |
| Applying formula without caveat for extreme body composition | Using the formula for highly muscular or very obese individuals | BMR significantly under- or over-estimated | For athletes with high muscle mass, actual BMR may be 10-15% higher. For very obese individuals, consider using adjusted body weight in the formula. |
| Treating BMR as the daily calorie target | Confusing BMR with TDEE | Severely under-eating -- sedentary people still burn 20% more than BMR through basic daily activities | BMR x activity factor = TDEE. Calorie targets are based on TDEE, not BMR. |
6 Reference & regulatory links
7 Professional workflow
Common tools used alongside this one: