Skip to calculator
Nutrition Free · No login

Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)

Basal metabolic rate using Mifflin–St Jeor equation. The foundation for all calorie and nutrition planning. Metric and imperial. Free online.

🔥
🎯

Client wants to understand why they gained weight eating what seemed like 'normal' amounts. Before you can explain calorie balance, you need their actual BMR so the conversation is grounded in their specific numbers.

Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR)
Nutrition
Imperial: lb auto-converts
Imperial: inches auto-convert
Mifflin (M): (10×W) + (6.25×H) − (5×A) + 5 Mifflin (F): (10×W) + (6.25×H) − (5×A) − 161 Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) is the most accurate for general population — validated in multiple studies. Harris-Benedict (1984 revision) remains widely used but overestimates by ~5% on average.
ℹ️ Results are estimates for planning purposes. Verify with current standards and a qualified professional.

1 What this calculator does

Calculates Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) -- the calories burned at complete rest to maintain vital functions. Uses Mifflin-St Jeor (most validated) and Harris-Benedict revised (1984) for comparison. BMR is the foundation for all calorie and nutrition planning.

2 Formula & professional reasoning

Mifflin-St Jeor (1990): Male: BMR = (10 x kg) + (6.25 x cm) - (5 x age) + 5 Female: BMR = (10 x kg) + (6.25 x cm) - (5 x age) - 161 Harris-Benedict revised (Roza and Shizgal 1984): Male: BMR = 88.362 + (13.397 x kg) + (4.799 x cm) - (5.677 x age) Female: BMR = 447.593 + (9.247 x kg) + (3.098 x cm) - (4.330 x age)

BMR represents approximately 60-70% of total daily energy expenditure for sedentary adults. Mifflin-St Jeor is preferred over the original Harris-Benedict (1919) because it was validated on a larger, more diverse modern population and is more accurate for both normal-weight and obese individuals. Both are estimates with approximately +-10% individual variation.

3 Worked examples

⚠️ Illustrative example only — not clinical or professional instruction.

Basic
Sedentary adult male
Given: Weight: 85 kg | Height: 178 cm | Age: 35 | Sex: male
Working: Mifflin: (10x85)+(6.25x178)-(5x35)+5 = 850+1112.5-175+5
Answer: BMR 1,792 kcal/day (Mifflin) | Harris-Benedict: 1,842 kcal/day
💡 This person burns 1,792 kcal per day just to stay alive at rest. Eating less than this causes metabolic adaptation over time.
Standard
Active adult female
Given: Weight: 62 kg | Height: 165 cm | Age: 29 | Sex: female
Working: Mifflin: (10x62)+(6.25x165)-(5x29)-161 = 620+1031.25-145-161
Answer: BMR 1,345 kcal/day (Mifflin) | Harris-Benedict: 1,392 kcal/day
💡 A 1,200 kcal diet puts her 145 kcal below BMR -- metabolically stressful and unsustainable. Always set calorie targets above BMR.
Advanced
Age effect on BMR
Given: Weight: 75 kg | Height: 170 cm | Age: 65 | Sex: male
Working: Mifflin: (10x75)+(6.25x170)-(5x65)+5 = 750+1062.5-325+5
Answer: BMR 1,492 kcal/day at age 65 vs 1,792 kcal at age 35 -- 300 kcal lower
💡 BMR drops approximately 300 kcal between age 35 and 65 for this example. Resistance training preserves lean muscle mass and slows BMR decline significantly.

4 Sanity check

Typical adult BMR range
Women: 1,200-1,600 kcal/day | Men: 1,500-2,100 kcal/day
Results outside these ranges warrant a double-check of inputs.
Never eat below BMR long-term
Eating below BMR causes metabolic adaptation, muscle loss and hormonal disruption
Minimum safe calorie intake: women ~1,200 kcal/day, men ~1,500 kcal/day -- absolute minimums, not targets.
BMR drops with age
Approximately 1-2% per decade after age 30, faster after 50
Resistance training is the most effective strategy to preserve BMR.
Formula accuracy
+-10% individual variation -- actual BMR can differ from calculated by 100-200 kcal
Weight response over 2-3 weeks is more reliable than formulas alone.

5 Common errors

ErrorCauseConsequenceFix
Eating below BMR as a weight loss strategy Thinking a larger deficit is always better Metabolic adaptation, muscle loss, hormonal disruption, rebound weight gain Weight loss calorie targets should be above BMR. A moderate 300-500 kcal deficit below TDEE is the evidence-based approach -- not below BMR.
Using the original 1919 Harris-Benedict formula Older textbooks still reference the original equation BMR overestimated by 5-15% -- inflated calorie targets Use Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) as the primary reference. The revised Harris-Benedict (1984) is acceptable but slightly less accurate.
Applying formula without caveat for extreme body composition Using the formula for highly muscular or very obese individuals BMR significantly under- or over-estimated For athletes with high muscle mass, actual BMR may be 10-15% higher. For very obese individuals, consider using adjusted body weight in the formula.
Treating BMR as the daily calorie target Confusing BMR with TDEE Severely under-eating -- sedentary people still burn 20% more than BMR through basic daily activities BMR x activity factor = TDEE. Calorie targets are based on TDEE, not BMR.